Pulitzer Prize Winner: How to Speak So People Actually Listen
This summary and rewrite, optimized for Google SEO standards in English, details the key insights from an interview with Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and author Charles Duhigg (author of The Power of Habit and Supercommunicators) on developing effective communication skills. The discussion, led by Craig Groeschel, focuses on the role of “keystone habits” in driving organizational change, the importance of psychological safety, and the necessity of aligning with others’ mindsets for meaningful connection.
Part I: The Power of Keystone Habits in Life and Leadership
The core premise of Duhigg’s work, particularly in The Power of Habit, revolves around the concept of a keystone habit—a singular pattern change that initiates a compounding chain reaction of other positive habits.
Defining Keystone Habits
A keystone habit is an action that, when shifted, causes other habits and patterns to start shifting as well.
- Examples: Exercise is a great example, as studies show that on days people exercise, they eat more healthfully, use credit cards less often, and procrastinate less at work and at home. Other examples include making your bed, doing dishes immediately after dinner, or starting the day with a non-email item from a to-do list.
- The Chain Reaction: Changing a keystone habit gives individuals the power to set off a chain reaction, making other types of change easier to accomplish.
- Internal Shift: Keystone habits often work because they change how we see ourselves and how we experience the world. For example, someone who starts running regularly might begin to see themselves as an “exerciser” or “jock,” which subconsciously influences them to make healthier eating choices or be more disciplined at work.
Discovering Your Keystone Habit
Duhigg advises that to discover a personal keystone habit, one should look for types of change that seem irrationally hard or scary.
- If an action seems harder than it should be (like running two blocks for someone who isn’t athletic), making that adjustment can be a keystone habit because it forces a shift in self-perception.
- The benefit of focusing on these small, tangible changes is their ability to “cross-collateralize” into successful areas and have broader impact.
Organizational Keystone Habits
The discussion extended this concept to organizations, where an accidental activity can become a keystone habit with exponential benefits.
- Case Study: Stage Communication Drills: Craig Groeschel shared that conducting weekly “stage communication drills” at Life Church—where leaders practice communication and give feedback—accidentally became a crucial ingredient for teaching the entire team to give and receive feedback effectively across all areas of the organization.
- Creating Organizational Change: The best organizational habits often emerge when institutions evolve and learn, sometimes accidentally. They function as “little pressure points that can have huge dividends”.
Part II: Driving Innovation by Celebrating Mistakes
Duhigg offered actionable strategies for leaders seeking organizational keystone habits that foster speed and efficiency, especially in complex, growing organizations that suffer from bureaucracy and “organizational scar tissue”.
The Fear of Mistakes as the Root Problem
Growth often creates complexity, and complexity kills growth. Bureaucracy and slow decision-making (scar tissue) stem from the fear of mistakes in the past.
- The Alcoa Example: A CEO focused on creating a “no-accident workplace” saw a compounding win: by improving safety systems, communication, accountability, and hiring, production and profit mysteriously increased.
- The NASA Example: When NASA faced bureaucratic stagnation, the leader instituted a policy where, anytime something went wrong in mission control, the entire team would applaud. This simple habit changed the culture by valorizing learning and risk-taking.
The Solution: Valorizing Failure
The habit that needs to emerge in complex organizations is applauding when a mistake occurs.
- Learning Opportunity: Leaders must reframe mistakes as an opportunity to learn how to do something better.
- Modeling Behavior: Leaders can valorize quick decision-making and initiative by sending out a weekly email describing three things they did wrong and what they learned, encouraging colleagues to do the same.
- “Whoa” vs. “Giddy Up”: Groeschel shared that he sometimes assigns high-potential, but hesitant, employees to make three “aggressive mistakes” in a quarter, choosing to celebrate getting “too aggressive” over being held back by fear.
Part III: The Supercommunicator Framework
Effective communication is not an innate gift but a skill that must be practiced and thought about. The best communicators are often those who consciously study and practice communication. Duhigg’s work in Supercommunicators reveals that conversations operate on multiple levels simultaneously.
The Three Types of Conversations
Researchers have found that when people communicate, they are usually having multiple different kinds of conversations that fall into one of three buckets:
- Practical Conversations: Focused on solving problems, making plans, or giving specific feedback.
- Emotional Conversations: Focused on feelings and empathy, without the need for problem-solving.
- Social Conversations: Focused on how participants relate to each other, identity, and group dynamics.
The Key: Matching Mindsets
The critical error in communication (in marriage, coaching, or public speaking) is when participants are in different mindsets (e.g., one person is in an emotional mindset, and the other is in a practical mindset), leading them to miss each other.
Strategies for Alignment:
- Personal Communication: When giving feedback, a practical mindset (coaching performance) can trigger an emotional mindset (fear, defensiveness) in the other person. The leader must start by acknowledging the emotional state before moving to the practical.
- The Setup: Begin by saying, “I want you to know I really like having you around” (emotional safety), and then ask for permission to move to the practical: “Can I give you some advice on how to do the job better?”.
- Leading with Questions: To find out which mindset the other person is in, ask a deep question about their values, beliefs, or experiences. For example: “What are you worried about? What’s blocking you from doing the job you want to do?”.
- Public Communication: When addressing a group (especially in a faith-based setting), the audience may be in an emotional or social mindset (seeking spiritual connection or communion) while the speaker assumes a practical mindset (logistics). The speaker must signal that they understand the audience’s mindset before diving into logistics.
- Asking the Audience: A speaker can establish a dialogue by asking simple questions that reveal the audience’s current state (e.g., “How many of you woke up with something about work on your mind? How many about home?”).
- Asking Permission: If the audience is in an emotional state, the speaker can say, “I understand a number of you are struggling… can we talk about how we get better at work, ’cause I think that’ll help you at home as well?” This asks for permission to shift to the practical conversation.